<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld liability for Service Tax on commissions received by the entities under Business Auxiliary Services, rejected the clubbing of turnovers, affirmed the applicability of the threshold exemption individually to each entity, and waived penalties subject to tax and interest payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld liability for Service Tax on commissions received by the entities under Business Auxiliary Services, rejected the clubbing of turnovers, affirmed the applicability of the threshold exemption individually to each entity, and waived penalties subject to tax and interest payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>