<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 427 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363119</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision due to the Respondent&#039;s alleged suppression of material facts regarding service under the &#039;rent-a-cab operator service&#039; category. The impugned order was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 427 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363119</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision due to the Respondent&#039;s alleged suppression of material facts regarding service under the &#039;rent-a-cab operator service&#039; category. The impugned order was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>