<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 423 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363115</link>
    <description>Glass tubes made before 01.04.2007 by the mouth blowing process were treated as exempt under Notification No. 6/2002-CE because contemporaneous evidence supported the assessee&#039;s manufacturing method and the revenue produced no contrary investigation or rebuttal material. For the period from 01.04.2007, manufacture through a compressor was considered dutiable in principle, but the Small Scale Exemption claim depended on verification of aggregate clearances and was therefore remanded for limited factual examination. In light of the substantive relief on exemption and the need for fresh SSI scrutiny, the penalties were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 423 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363115</link>
      <description>Glass tubes made before 01.04.2007 by the mouth blowing process were treated as exempt under Notification No. 6/2002-CE because contemporaneous evidence supported the assessee&#039;s manufacturing method and the revenue produced no contrary investigation or rebuttal material. For the period from 01.04.2007, manufacture through a compressor was considered dutiable in principle, but the Small Scale Exemption claim depended on verification of aggregate clearances and was therefore remanded for limited factual examination. In light of the substantive relief on exemption and the need for fresh SSI scrutiny, the penalties were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>