<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 419 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363111</link>
    <description>Where the record established that admissible Modvat credit was available on the relevant inputs and capital goods during the disputed period, the corresponding duty demand was treated as revenue neutral and stood offset by the available credit. On that basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the adjudication order passed on remand, upheld the order, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 419 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363111</link>
      <description>Where the record established that admissible Modvat credit was available on the relevant inputs and capital goods during the disputed period, the corresponding duty demand was treated as revenue neutral and stood offset by the available credit. On that basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the adjudication order passed on remand, upheld the order, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>