<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 398 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363090</link>
    <description>An amnesty scheme does not prevent further statutory action for enhancement of tax, penalty or interest where the scheme expressly preserves that power. The assessee&#039;s claim that the assessment had attained finality and merged with the amnesty order was rejected because the scheme contemplated subsequent revision. On the reference issue, a proposed question that had not been pressed before the Tribunal did not arise from the impugned order and therefore could not support a reference. The revisional order was treated as sustainable despite prior amnesty relief, and the request to refer the proposed questions of law was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 398 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363090</link>
      <description>An amnesty scheme does not prevent further statutory action for enhancement of tax, penalty or interest where the scheme expressly preserves that power. The assessee&#039;s claim that the assessment had attained finality and merged with the amnesty order was rejected because the scheme contemplated subsequent revision. On the reference issue, a proposed question that had not been pressed before the Tribunal did not arise from the impugned order and therefore could not support a reference. The revisional order was treated as sustainable despite prior amnesty relief, and the request to refer the proposed questions of law was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>