<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1676 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273668</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2010-11. The appeal involved the exclusion of comparables in the Transaction Net Margin Method analysis due to functional dissimilarity. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1676 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273668</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2010-11. The appeal involved the exclusion of comparables in the Transaction Net Margin Method analysis due to functional dissimilarity. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>