<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1323 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273670</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court corrected its earlier order by recording that I.A. No. 53586 of 2017 filed by the respondent stood dismissed. It further reserved liberty for the parties to raise the relevant issues before the NCLT and restored the special leave petitions to their original numbers. The operative effect was to amend the prior order to reflect the dismissal of the interlocutory application while preserving adjudication of the underlying issues before the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 08:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1323 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273670</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court corrected its earlier order by recording that I.A. No. 53586 of 2017 filed by the respondent stood dismissed. It further reserved liberty for the parties to raise the relevant issues before the NCLT and restored the special leave petitions to their original numbers. The operative effect was to amend the prior order to reflect the dismissal of the interlocutory application while preserving adjudication of the underlying issues before the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>