https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363088 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the application I.A 252/2017 filed by respondent no. 2 in the company petition, seeking direction to ROC Ahmedabad for filing forms related to the AGM. The Tribunal found that the appellant, not a party to the initial proceedings, could not directly appeal the rejection of the application and emphasized the need to seek relief through the appropriate forum. The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jul 2018 08:17:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363088 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the application I.A 252/2017 filed by respondent no. 2 in the company petition, seeking direction to ROC Ahmedabad for filing forms related to the AGM. The Tribunal found that the appellant, not a party to the initial proceedings, could not directly appeal the rejection of the application and emphasized the need to seek relief through the appropriate forum. The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363088