<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 372 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363064</link>
    <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was confirmed. The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be made for the assessment year 2005-06 as the amounts were credited in the books for the assessment year 2000-01. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the right person, right year, and right income. The deletion of the addition was upheld, and the order was pronounced on 05.07.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 08:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 372 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363064</link>
      <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was confirmed. The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be made for the assessment year 2005-06 as the amounts were credited in the books for the assessment year 2000-01. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the right person, right year, and right income. The deletion of the addition was upheld, and the order was pronounced on 05.07.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>