<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, determining that the loans were genuine and overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the validity of reassessment proceedings, finding no evidence of failure to disclose material facts and dismissing the AO&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 361 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, determining that the loans were genuine and overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the validity of reassessment proceedings, finding no evidence of failure to disclose material facts and dismissing the AO&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>