https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363041 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating the imported goods and demanding differential duty, fine, and penalty. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the goods should be classified as metallic scrap based on evidence presented, rejecting the mis-declaration claims by customs authorities. The decision emphasized the significance of internationally accepted parameters and inspection reports in determining the correct classification of imported goods. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363041 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating the imported goods and demanding differential duty, fine, and penalty. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the goods should be classified as metallic scrap based on evidence presented, rejecting the mis-declaration claims by customs authorities. The decision emphasized the significance of internationally accepted parameters and inspection reports in determining the correct classification of imported goods. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363041