<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals regarding the classification of imported coal to the adjudicating authority following the Larger Bench&#039;s decision. The waiver of predeposit was modified by the department, leading to conflicting decisions by different CESTAT Benches. The matter was referred to the Larger Bench, which directed waiting for the Apex Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal upheld the remand based on the Larger Bench&#039;s ruling, setting aside impugned orders and dismissing the miscellaneous applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 08:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals regarding the classification of imported coal to the adjudicating authority following the Larger Bench&#039;s decision. The waiver of predeposit was modified by the department, leading to conflicting decisions by different CESTAT Benches. The matter was referred to the Larger Bench, which directed waiting for the Apex Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal upheld the remand based on the Larger Bench&#039;s ruling, setting aside impugned orders and dismissing the miscellaneous applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>