<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to impose a Redemption Fine of Rs. 1 Lakh on the owner of a truck found carrying smuggled goods, despite the penalty being set aside. The appellant failed to prove lack of knowledge about the illegal goods loaded onto her truck, leading to the confiscation of the truck under Section 115 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing evidence of the driver&#039;s awareness of the smuggled goods and the irrelevance of the cited case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to impose a Redemption Fine of Rs. 1 Lakh on the owner of a truck found carrying smuggled goods, despite the penalty being set aside. The appellant failed to prove lack of knowledge about the illegal goods loaded onto her truck, leading to the confiscation of the truck under Section 115 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing evidence of the driver&#039;s awareness of the smuggled goods and the irrelevance of the cited case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>