<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 342 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363034</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to confiscate goods and impose penalties on the appellant for concealing and transporting seized goods under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to discrepancies in statements and failure to explain irregularities in the loading process, leading to the affirmation of penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 342 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363034</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to confiscate goods and impose penalties on the appellant for concealing and transporting seized goods under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to discrepancies in statements and failure to explain irregularities in the loading process, leading to the affirmation of penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>