<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for reversal of input service credits for services going into exempted services but remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority to determine the proportionate amount of common input service credit attributable to exempted services. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 08:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for reversal of input service credits for services going into exempted services but remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority to determine the proportionate amount of common input service credit attributable to exempted services. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>