<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 333 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for service tax on freight charges under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) for the period 2004-2010. The Tribunal also held that services provided to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units are exempt under Notification No. 4/2004, even if partially consumed outside the SEZ. The department&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 333 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for service tax on freight charges under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) for the period 2004-2010. The Tribunal also held that services provided to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units are exempt under Notification No. 4/2004, even if partially consumed outside the SEZ. The department&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>