<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 320 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proof before confirming allegations of clandestine activities and imposing penalties. The lack of concrete evidence regarding clandestine removal and duty demand led to the rejection of the charges and penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 320 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proof before confirming allegations of clandestine activities and imposing penalties. The lack of concrete evidence regarding clandestine removal and duty demand led to the rejection of the charges and penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>