<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 54 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13584</link>
    <description>The HC concluded that the notice issued u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was invalid as it was based on a change of opinion rather than a failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. Consequently, the notice lacked jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute according to the specified prayer clauses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 54 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13584</link>
      <description>The HC concluded that the notice issued u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was invalid as it was based on a change of opinion rather than a failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. Consequently, the notice lacked jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute according to the specified prayer clauses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>