<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 289 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the penalty of Rs. 90,000 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, deeming the penalty unwarranted and ordering its deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 289 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the penalty of Rs. 90,000 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, deeming the penalty unwarranted and ordering its deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>