<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 176 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13581</link>
    <description>The penalty of Rs. 4,58,393 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was set aside by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench &quot;C&quot;. The dispute arose over a deduction claim of Rs. 10,66,029 as format fee, which the Assessing Officer disallowed. The assessee had withdrawn the claim in time and offered the amount for tax, leading to the High Court dismissing the appeal and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:27:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 176 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13581</link>
      <description>The penalty of Rs. 4,58,393 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was set aside by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench &quot;C&quot;. The dispute arose over a deduction claim of Rs. 10,66,029 as format fee, which the Assessing Officer disallowed. The assessee had withdrawn the claim in time and offered the amount for tax, leading to the High Court dismissing the appeal and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>