<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 272 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for verification and assessment regarding alleged contravention of Rule 4(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and irregular availment of CENVAT credit on capital goods, giving the respondent assessee an opportunity to be heard. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, leading to further scrutiny of documents and assessment by the Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 07:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 272 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for verification and assessment regarding alleged contravention of Rule 4(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and irregular availment of CENVAT credit on capital goods, giving the respondent assessee an opportunity to be heard. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, leading to further scrutiny of documents and assessment by the Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>