<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 268 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal as they found no reason to interfere. The decision was based on the interpretation of maintenance and repair service under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, and the applicability of service tax during the warranty period for services provided by an authorized service agent on behalf of the manufacturer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 07:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 268 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal as they found no reason to interfere. The decision was based on the interpretation of maintenance and repair service under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, and the applicability of service tax during the warranty period for services provided by an authorized service agent on behalf of the manufacturer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>