<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 234 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362926</link>
    <description>Where a first appellate authority makes a reasoned factual estimate of suppressed purchase and sales turnover on survey material and seized invoices, a later appellate forum cannot disturb that estimate without cogent reasons. Here, the books were rejected after a survey and irregularities in invoice records were found, but the first appellate authority reduced the estimated evaded turnover after examining the disputed invoices and business circumstances. The Tribunal enhanced the estimate without adequately addressing that factual assessment. The High Court restored the first appellate authority&#039;s estimate and modified the tax consequence accordingly, so the Tribunal&#039;s enhancement of liability did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 07:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 234 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362926</link>
      <description>Where a first appellate authority makes a reasoned factual estimate of suppressed purchase and sales turnover on survey material and seized invoices, a later appellate forum cannot disturb that estimate without cogent reasons. Here, the books were rejected after a survey and irregularities in invoice records were found, but the first appellate authority reduced the estimated evaded turnover after examining the disputed invoices and business circumstances. The Tribunal enhanced the estimate without adequately addressing that factual assessment. The High Court restored the first appellate authority&#039;s estimate and modified the tax consequence accordingly, so the Tribunal&#039;s enhancement of liability did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>