https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362917 The court held that the Settlement Commission's rejection of the application based on a technical ground was unjustified. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pay the shortfall in tax and interest. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration. The Settlement Commission was directed to allow the petitioner to rectify the shortfall within two weeks and proceed with the application on merits. en-us Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362917 The court held that the Settlement Commission's rejection of the application based on a technical ground was unjustified. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to pay the shortfall in tax and interest. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration. The Settlement Commission was directed to allow the petitioner to rectify the shortfall within two weeks and proceed with the application on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362917