<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, reversing the findings of the AO and CIT(A) on the royalty payment allocation and the exclusion of excise duty refunds from book profits. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the nature of excise duty refunds as capital receipts and the deletion of interest disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, reversing the findings of the AO and CIT(A) on the royalty payment allocation and the exclusion of excise duty refunds from book profits. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the nature of excise duty refunds as capital receipts and the deletion of interest disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>