<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 202 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362894</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition both for delay and on merits, leaving the lower court outcome undisturbed. The order reflects that the challenge in the income tax matter did not merit interference at the threshold and was also barred by delay. No substantive question of tax law was separately discussed in the brief order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 202 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362894</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition both for delay and on merits, leaving the lower court outcome undisturbed. The order reflects that the challenge in the income tax matter did not merit interference at the threshold and was also barred by delay. No substantive question of tax law was separately discussed in the brief order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>