https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362886 The court upheld the authority's rejection of cross-examination requests, emphasizing that officers acted based on official documents. The petitioner's request was deemed unreasonable, directing them to challenge assessments before the Adjudicating Authority and appeal to CESTAT. The court dismissed the Writ Petition without judgment on the case's merits, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate appellate route for resolving classification disputes. en-us Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:58:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362886 The court upheld the authority's rejection of cross-examination requests, emphasizing that officers acted based on official documents. The petitioner's request was deemed unreasonable, directing them to challenge assessments before the Adjudicating Authority and appeal to CESTAT. The court dismissed the Writ Petition without judgment on the case's merits, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate appellate route for resolving classification disputes. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362886