<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 128 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13567</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling in favor of the assessee. The royalty payments to Mitsubishi Motors Corporation were deemed revenue expenditure, not capital, under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee to raise an additional ground regarding funded interest, as it pertained to tax liability with relevant facts on record. Furthermore, the Tribunal&#039;s confirmation of depreciation on notional foreign exchange fluctuation was upheld, as it did not constitute a substantial question of law. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 128 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13567</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling in favor of the assessee. The royalty payments to Mitsubishi Motors Corporation were deemed revenue expenditure, not capital, under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee to raise an additional ground regarding funded interest, as it pertained to tax liability with relevant facts on record. Furthermore, the Tribunal&#039;s confirmation of depreciation on notional foreign exchange fluctuation was upheld, as it did not constitute a substantial question of law. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>