<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim due to a missing endorsement on sales invoices under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for the appellant to submit complete invoices for verification in accordance with legal precedents cited, including the Chowgule &amp;amp; Company Pvt. Ltd. decision. The appeal was allowed for further consideration, emphasizing compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim due to a missing endorsement on sales invoices under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for the appellant to submit complete invoices for verification in accordance with legal precedents cited, including the Chowgule &amp;amp; Company Pvt. Ltd. decision. The appeal was allowed for further consideration, emphasizing compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>