https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362876 The Court found that the Settlement Commission had not given the petitioner sufficient opportunity to submit documents and had not properly considered the petitioner's explanations. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration. The Court directed the Commission to reconsider the Settlement Application after giving the parties an opportunity to be heard and to decide the application in accordance with law, without being influenced by the previous order. The Rule was made absolute in favor of the petitioner, and the Writ Petition was disposed of. en-us Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362876 The Court found that the Settlement Commission had not given the petitioner sufficient opportunity to submit documents and had not properly considered the petitioner's explanations. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the Settlement Commission for fresh consideration. The Court directed the Commission to reconsider the Settlement Application after giving the parties an opportunity to be heard and to decide the application in accordance with law, without being influenced by the previous order. The Rule was made absolute in favor of the petitioner, and the Writ Petition was disposed of. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362876