<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 180 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a detailed review of the classification of services and the calculation of tax liability. It emphasized the necessity of considering all contracts separately and not categorizing all as Construction Service, directing the Authority to reevaluate the submissions and appeals within three months to ensure a fair hearing for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 180 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a detailed review of the classification of services and the calculation of tax liability. It emphasized the necessity of considering all contracts separately and not categorizing all as Construction Service, directing the Authority to reevaluate the submissions and appeals within three months to ensure a fair hearing for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>