https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362859 The tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and imposed penalties on the appellant for availing ineligible CENVAT credit on input services, including vehicle insurance and construction-related services. Despite the appellant's disclosure of the full credit value in filings, the tribunal found violations of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, leading to duty evasion and the imposition of fines and interest. The appellant's failure to appear in proceedings and lack of supporting agreements further weakened their case, resulting in the rejection of the appeal. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:43:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362859 The tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and imposed penalties on the appellant for availing ineligible CENVAT credit on input services, including vehicle insurance and construction-related services. Despite the appellant's disclosure of the full credit value in filings, the tribunal found violations of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, leading to duty evasion and the imposition of fines and interest. The appellant's failure to appear in proceedings and lack of supporting agreements further weakened their case, resulting in the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362859