https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362849 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal regarding the availment of cenvat credit for services classified as penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) had initially upheld the disqualification of cenvat credit, but the Tribunal found that the services were related to manufacturing excisable goods and fell within the definition of input service. Emphasizing the agreement terms and jurisdictional limitations, the Tribunal concluded that the denial of cenvat credit was unjustified. As the service tax payment was undisputed, the impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the Appellant. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:43:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362849 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal regarding the availment of cenvat credit for services classified as penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) had initially upheld the disqualification of cenvat credit, but the Tribunal found that the services were related to manufacturing excisable goods and fell within the definition of input service. Emphasizing the agreement terms and jurisdictional limitations, the Tribunal concluded that the denial of cenvat credit was unjustified. As the service tax payment was undisputed, the impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362849