https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362842 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal and disposing of the cross-objection. The order was pronounced in the open court, concluding the legal proceedings. The penalty under Rule 26 was set aside as the goods received at a different depot due to operational changes did not violate statutory provisions. Rules 11(2) and 26(2) were deemed inapplicable as there was no issuance of invoices without goods delivery or enabling ineligible benefits. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:42:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362842 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal and disposing of the cross-objection. The order was pronounced in the open court, concluding the legal proceedings. The penalty under Rule 26 was set aside as the goods received at a different depot due to operational changes did not violate statutory provisions. Rules 11(2) and 26(2) were deemed inapplicable as there was no issuance of invoices without goods delivery or enabling ineligible benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362842