<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 707 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving manufacturers of parts of Air-conditioning and Refrigeration appliances who were found to have manufactured and cleared goods without duty payment through fraudulent means. The Tribunal criticized the reliance on retracted statements without corroboration, lack of evidence on manufacturing facilities, failure to issue notice to another manufacturing unit, and absence of independent evidence. It emphasized the importance of thorough investigations, corroborative evidence, and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 707 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving manufacturers of parts of Air-conditioning and Refrigeration appliances who were found to have manufactured and cleared goods without duty payment through fraudulent means. The Tribunal criticized the reliance on retracted statements without corroboration, lack of evidence on manufacturing facilities, failure to issue notice to another manufacturing unit, and absence of independent evidence. It emphasized the importance of thorough investigations, corroborative evidence, and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>