<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 981 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273592</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny deduction under s. 80-IA for DEPB license and interest on margin money deposit. The Court emphasized the requirement for a direct nexus between income and the industrial undertaking for claiming deductions under s. 80HH and ruled that interest earned on amounts retained by the bank does not qualify for deduction under s. 80-I due to its link to better business prospects rather than export earnings. Previous judgments supported this stance, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:16:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 981 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273592</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny deduction under s. 80-IA for DEPB license and interest on margin money deposit. The Court emphasized the requirement for a direct nexus between income and the industrial undertaking for claiming deductions under s. 80HH and ruled that interest earned on amounts retained by the bank does not qualify for deduction under s. 80-I due to its link to better business prospects rather than export earnings. Previous judgments supported this stance, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>