<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 141 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362833</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition on the peculiar facts of the matter and expressly did not examine the question of law raised. The order records that delay was condoned, but the substantive tax controversy was left undecided because the Court declined to enter into the legal issue. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 141 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362833</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition on the peculiar facts of the matter and expressly did not examine the question of law raised. The order records that delay was condoned, but the substantive tax controversy was left undecided because the Court declined to enter into the legal issue. Pending applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>