<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362826</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court held that the approval process under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act did not require a pre-grant hearing as contended by the Assessee. Additionally, the Assessee&#039;s claim of deduction under Section 54B was denied as the land sold did not meet the agricultural use criteria. The Court found no substantial legal questions in both issues, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362826</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The Court held that the approval process under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act did not require a pre-grant hearing as contended by the Assessee. Additionally, the Assessee&#039;s claim of deduction under Section 54B was denied as the land sold did not meet the agricultural use criteria. The Court found no substantial legal questions in both issues, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>