<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowances under Sections 40(a)(i) and 40A(3) related to TDS on airfreight payments and cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000. However, the Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D as consequential, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowances under Sections 40(a)(i) and 40A(3) related to TDS on airfreight payments and cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000. However, the Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D as consequential, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>