<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362821</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,20,00,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding bogus share capital was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and emphasized the necessity of addressing all issues raised during appellate proceedings, including the validity of reopening assessments, for a comprehensive resolution in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362821</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,20,00,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding bogus share capital was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and emphasized the necessity of addressing all issues raised during appellate proceedings, including the validity of reopening assessments, for a comprehensive resolution in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>