<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362816</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the license fee disallowance as it was considered part of the purchase cost and not subject to TDS. Additionally, the disallowance of travelling expenses was restricted to 25% of the total amount due to lack of evidence, despite the business purpose claim. Grounds 3 and 4 were not addressed in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362816</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the license fee disallowance as it was considered part of the purchase cost and not subject to TDS. Additionally, the disallowance of travelling expenses was restricted to 25% of the total amount due to lack of evidence, despite the business purpose claim. Grounds 3 and 4 were not addressed in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>