<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the jewellery declared in wealth tax returns sufficient to explain the jewellery found during the search. Precedents from related cases within the DS Group were followed, resulting in the deletion of the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the jewellery declared in wealth tax returns sufficient to explain the jewellery found during the search. Precedents from related cases within the DS Group were followed, resulting in the deletion of the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>