<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants&#039; Fraud Attempt in SEZ Import Case Denies Lenient Provisional Release of Goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40225</link>
    <description>Provisional release of goods - The negotiations for import were directly carried out by the appellants themselves with the foreign supplier but the import were routed through an intermediary in the SEZ Unit. - There was an apparent attempt to commit fraud and in these circumstances lenient view in imposing the condition of provisional release cannot be taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants&#039; Fraud Attempt in SEZ Import Case Denies Lenient Provisional Release of Goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40225</link>
      <description>Provisional release of goods - The negotiations for import were directly carried out by the appellants themselves with the foreign supplier but the import were routed through an intermediary in the SEZ Unit. - There was an apparent attempt to commit fraud and in these circumstances lenient view in imposing the condition of provisional release cannot be taken.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>