<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 109 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, modifying the conditions for provisional release to require a bank guarantee covering 100% of the differential duty, while maintaining other conditions. The judgment emphasized the need for discretion and fairness in imposing conditions for provisional release, considering the specific facts and circumstances of each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 109 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, modifying the conditions for provisional release to require a bank guarantee covering 100% of the differential duty, while maintaining other conditions. The judgment emphasized the need for discretion and fairness in imposing conditions for provisional release, considering the specific facts and circumstances of each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>