https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793 High Court revision under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC cannot be used to reappreciate evidence and overturn concurrent findings unless they are perverse, wholly unreasonable, unsupported by material, or cause miscarriage of justice. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, once execution of the cheque and signature are proved, the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arises in favour of the complainant. A bare denial or unsupported plea is insufficient to rebut that presumption; the accused must bring probable and credible material showing non-existence of debt or liability. On those principles, the conviction under Section 138 was restored. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793 High Court revision under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC cannot be used to reappreciate evidence and overturn concurrent findings unless they are perverse, wholly unreasonable, unsupported by material, or cause miscarriage of justice. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, once execution of the cheque and signature are proved, the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arises in favour of the complainant. A bare denial or unsupported plea is insufficient to rebut that presumption; the accused must bring probable and credible material showing non-existence of debt or liability. On those principles, the conviction under Section 138 was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793