<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 101 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the trial court&#039;s conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and substituting its own view without legal basis. The presumption under Section 139 was rightly drawn against the accused, who failed to rebut it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 101 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the trial court&#039;s conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and substituting its own view without legal basis. The presumption under Section 139 was rightly drawn against the accused, who failed to rebut it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>