https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362791 Cenvat credit on goods transport agency service for outward transportation from the place of removal to the buyer's premises was held inadmissible because Rule 2(l) confines credit to services used up to the place of removal. The text further states that non-disclosure of such credit to the Department, revealed only on audit, constituted suppression of facts and justified invocation of the extended limitation period and penalty. On that basis, the demand, interest, and penalty were sustained and the appeal was rejected. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:24:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362791 Cenvat credit on goods transport agency service for outward transportation from the place of removal to the buyer's premises was held inadmissible because Rule 2(l) confines credit to services used up to the place of removal. The text further states that non-disclosure of such credit to the Department, revealed only on audit, constituted suppression of facts and justified invocation of the extended limitation period and penalty. On that basis, the demand, interest, and penalty were sustained and the appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362791