https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362786 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case concerning service tax liability on advance amounts and security deposits for 'Mandap Keeper Service.' The Tribunal held that interest liability on the security deposit was not justified as per the rules in force until September 2007. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellants. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:24:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362786 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case concerning service tax liability on advance amounts and security deposits for 'Mandap Keeper Service.' The Tribunal held that interest liability on the security deposit was not justified as per the rules in force until September 2007. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362786