https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362785 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of an advertising company challenging the refusal of cenvat credit on input services amounting to Rs. 8,08,800. The Commissioner erred in disallowing the credit and invoking an extended limitation period. The Tribunal found that the appellant's payments for invoices were made after the relevant date, aligning with the proviso to Rule 3, thus allowing the appeal and setting aside the orders of the Commissioner and the adjudicating authority. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362785 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of an advertising company challenging the refusal of cenvat credit on input services amounting to Rs. 8,08,800. The Commissioner erred in disallowing the credit and invoking an extended limitation period. The Tribunal found that the appellant's payments for invoices were made after the relevant date, aligning with the proviso to Rule 3, thus allowing the appeal and setting aside the orders of the Commissioner and the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362785