<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of credit availed before 14.3.2006, set aside the directive on the Circular declaration, and sustained the remand for input services verification. The requirement to raise invoices within 14 days under Rule 4A was deemed procedural and not mandatory. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to process the refund claim in line with these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of credit availed before 14.3.2006, set aside the directive on the Circular declaration, and sustained the remand for input services verification. The requirement to raise invoices within 14 days under Rule 4A was deemed procedural and not mandatory. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to process the refund claim in line with these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>