<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 89 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362781</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s short payment of service tax was due to an accounting error, leading to a situation that was revenue neutral. The tribunal determined that the demand for the short payment of service tax could not be sustained, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. It was emphasized that the entire issue stemmed from an accounting error and did not result in any revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 89 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362781</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s short payment of service tax was due to an accounting error, leading to a situation that was revenue neutral. The tribunal determined that the demand for the short payment of service tax could not be sustained, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. It was emphasized that the entire issue stemmed from an accounting error and did not result in any revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>